Richard Cornelisse

Archive for the ‘Tax News’ Category

PRESS RELEASE – TAXMARC™ ADDS BRAIN CAPACITY TO SAP AND ENABLES COMPANIES TO COMPLY WITH ALL VAT OBLIGATIONS

In Audit Defense, Business Strategy, EU development, Indirect Tax Strategic Plan, Processes and Controls, Tax News, Technology on 15/02/2013 at 1:45 pm

Real-time and fully automatic evaluation of tax compliance eliminates VAT risks

Amsterdam, February 15, 2013 – Taxmarc™ – an online VAT manager – provides companies with a complete overview of all data relevant to determining the VAT liability for business transactions.

This enables tailor-made  VAT determination of transactions. Moreover, Taxmarc™ provides an online tax control framework that encompasses real-time evaluation of tax compliance and the consistency of the combination of the VAT data entered.

Hereby it offers an effective tool that facilitates efficient deployment of employees and optimal risk management regarding indirect tax.

For virtually every company the efficiency of compliance with local VAT regulations depends entirely on the functionality of the underlying ERP system, such as SAP. Determining the VAT liability and recovery in these systems is only partly automated and is mostly done manually.

By drawing upon 30 parameters instead of the 4-8 parameters in standard SAP, Taxmarc™ enables – without extra interface – a fully automated VAT determination of all (chain) transactions in SAP.

The tool incorporates VAT relevant data of all legal entities in order to ensure the correct VAT determination of transactions. SAP exclusively focuses on transactions within a single company; it only assesses the underlying individual transactions and fails to link the current transactions to the VAT results of previous transactions.

As a consequence, companies with VAT registrations in different countries cannot automatically comply with all VAT obligations. In addition, many multinationals operate with different versions of ERP systems, each business unit often has a separate system and there are multiple core systems per country.

This creates genuine risks such as VAT assessments, insufficient VAT refunds, and possibly fraudulent transactions. Also, synchronizing the periodic VAT reports based on these different sources takes a lot of time and resources.

Extra ‘brain capacity’

“The business models of internationally operating enterprises have radically changed over the last couple of years. As business practices go beyond national boundaries and sufficient harmonization of regulations in different countries is lacking, maintaining the VAT position is extremely complicated.

Without the right VAT regulations, regular ERP systems fail to process data correctly, risking incorrect calculation of VAT, failure to comply with local VAT obligations, and transactions that cannot be commercially executed”,

Richard Cornelisse, Director Strategy & Sales of Taxmarc™ emphasizes.

“The standard functionality of SAP is insufficient for building a viable and adequate virtual VAT manager.

In actual practice, these flaws in SAP are often patched up in order to keep the system running. Taxmarc™ basically creates a bypass in SAP, thereby building on the standard functionality and infrastructure of SAP, but we are adding extra ‘brain capacity’.

Real-time fiscal monitoring

Taxmarc™ provides a VAT/GST Tax Control Framework integrated in SAP. This framework ensures that transactions that do not comply with tax laws are automatically blocked.

Beside the highly improved preventive controls regarding risk management, Taxmarc™ underpins more efficient business processes and increased productivity. It enables a substantial reduction of the working hours and resources that are spent on the regular manual tax return process, as well as centralization of local compliance functions (Shared Services Centers).

Taxmarc™ has been implemented by multiple renowned multinational companies, including AkzoNobel Chemicals, Sigma Aldrich, ASM International NV, Fujifilm and ExxonMobil.

Our business model is extremely complex, especially with regard to VAT. We’re operating worldwide with many (chain) transactions that go across the borders and therefore we often have multiple VAT registrations per legal entity. 

Using the standard settings in SAP, automatic VAT determination of individual transactions was not possible.

Taxmarc™ has enabled automatic VAT determination of all transactions for our company. Taxmarc™ identifies real-time when certain transactions are not possible, for instance because a local VAT registration is missing. 

Improbable and atypical results are immediately visible and can instantly be corrected, so corrections afterwards can be prevented. 

Client references are important and can be provided. It is your way to validate that we indeed keep our promise.

Taxmarc™ is investigated by a Big4 organization and is qualified as the best VAT quality solution for the complex business models of customers.

- END PRESS RELEASE –  

For more information

Richard Cornelisse, Director Strategy & Sales of Taxmarc™, phone: +31 6 53 99 48 74; e-mail: richard.cornelisse@taxmarc.com

Robbert Hoogeveen, Director Technology of Taxmarc™, phone: +31 6 57 94 70 93; e-mail: robbert.hoogeveen@taxmarc.com

Website: www.taxmarc.com/en/

taxmarc logo

OECD Issues Draft Guidelines On VAT On Services, Intangibles – February 2013

In EU development, General, Tax News on 10/02/2013 at 11:43 am

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD has released its latest set of draft Guidelines to address uncertainty and the risk of double taxation and unintended non-taxation that results from inconsistencies in nations application of value-added tax VAT to international trade, with a specific focus on trade in services and intangibles.

The Guidelines build on two core principles that were adopted by the OECD’s Committee on Fiscal Affairs in 2006:

  • The “neutrality” principle, whereby VAT is a tax on final consumption that should be neutral for business;
  • The “destination” principle, whereby internationally traded services and intangibles should be subject to VAT in their jurisdiction of consumption.

Read more: OECD Issues Draft Guidelines On VAT On Services, Intangibles.

OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines – Draft Consolidated

4 interim drafts:

  1. a preface to the Guidelines;
  2. the core features of VAT-systems to which the Guidelines are intended to apply,
  3. place of taxation for cross-border supplies of services and intangibles to businesses that have establishments in more than one jurisdiction,
  4. implementation of specific rules for determining the place of taxation for cross border business-to business supplies of services and intangibles.

OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines – Draft Consolidated - INVITATION FOR COMMENTS FEBRUARY 2013

VAT rates – European Commission – Situation at 14th January 2013

In EU development, Processes and Controls, Tax News on 20/01/2013 at 12:26 pm

VAT rates applicable in the EU Member States.

LIST OF VAT RATES APPLIED IN THE MEMBER STATES

VAT rates – European commission.

page3image3168

Member States

Code

Super Reduced Rate

Reduced Rate

Standard Rate

page3image7824

Parking Rate

Belgium

BE

-

6 / 12

21

12

Bulgaria

BG

9

20

-

Czech Republic

CZ

-

15

21

-

Denmark

DK

-

-

25

-

Germany

DE

-

7

19

-

Estonia

EE

-

9

20

-

Greece

EL

-

6,5 / 13

23

-

Spain

ES

4

10

21

-

France

FR

2,1

5,5 / 7

19,6

-

Ireland

IE

4,8

9 / 13,5

23

13,5

Italy

IT

4

10

21

-

Cyprus

CY

-

5/8

18

-

Latvia

LV

-

12

21

-

Lithuania

LT

-

5/9

21

-

Luxembourg

LU

3

6 / 12

15

12

Hungary

HU

-

5 / 18

27

-

Malta

MT

-

5/7

18

-

Netherlands

NL

-

6

21

-

Austria

AT

-

10

20

12

Poland

PL

5/8

23

-

Portugal

PT

-

6 / 13

23

13

Romania

RO

5/9

24

-

Slovenia

SI

-

8,5

20

-

Slovakia

SK

-

10

20

-

Finland

FI

-

10 / 14

24

-

Sweden

SE

-

6 / 12

25

-

United Kingdom

page3image127336

UK

-

5

20

-

page3image131480

N.B.:Exemptions with a refund of tax paid at preceding stages (zero rates) are not included above (see section V)

TAXUD- I

TAXUD-IITAXUD-III

Reblog: David Cameron: Tax avoiding foreign firms like Starbucks and Amazon lack ‘moral scruples’ – Telegraph

In Audit Defense, EU development, Tax News on 05/01/2013 at 2:03 pm

By Christopher Hope, Senior Political Correspondent from The Telegraph

Foreign companies like Starbucks and Amazon which have avoided paying large corporation tax bills in Britain lack “moral scruples”, David Cameron has said.

The Prime Minister said he was going to make “damn sure” that foreign companies like Starbucks and Amazon which have been found to avoid legally paying a large corporation tax in the UK paid their fair share.

Mr Cameron was speaking weeks after MPs on the Public Accounts Committee accused Starbucks, Google and Amazon in a high profile report of “immorally” minimising their UK tax bills.

Last year Treasury minister David Gauke caused a row when he told The Daily Telegraph that people who paid cash in hand to tradesmen, allowing them to avoid VAT, were “morally wrong”.

Mr Cameron was asked by a business audience in the north west of England on Thursday why “Starbucks and Amazon” were allowed to avoid paying large corporation tax bills, given that they have a large presence in the UK.

Mr Cameron said:

“We’ve got to crack that, you’re absolutely right. This is a really important issue. We’re saying, are going to have a really low rate of corporation tax but I want to make damn sure that those companies pay it.”

Mr Cameron said he wanted to start a debate in the UK about “really aggressive tax avoidance”.

He said: “We do need a debate in this country, not only what is against the law – that’s tax evasion, that is against the law, that’s illegal and if you do that the Inland Revenue will come down on you like a tonne of bricks – but what is unacceptable in terms of really aggressive tax avoidance.

“Because some people say to me, ‘Well, it’s all within the law; you’re obeying the law, it’s okay’. Well, actually there are lots of things that are within the law [that] we don’t do because actually we have some moral scruples about them and I think we need this debate about tax too.

“I’m not asking people to pay massive rates of tax. We’ve got a low top rate of income tax now; we’ve got a low rate of corporation tax now; we are a fair tax country. But I think it’s fair then to say to business, you know, we’re playing fair by you; you’ve got to play fair by us.

Mr Cameron’s words go much further than his letter to other leaders of the G8 economies when he said he wanted to stop this form of tax tourism.

He continued: “I’ve put it right at the top of the agenda for the G8 this year as well as making sure we fix it nationally too.

“It’s simply not fair and not right what some of them are doing by saying, I’ve got lots of sales here in the UK but I’m going to pay a sort of royalty fee to another company that I own in another country that has some special tax dispensation.

“That is that’s not right, and so we are looking at it. I’m chairing the G8 this year so I’m going to be getting the Americans and the French and the Germans and the Italians and the Japanese all to look at this together at how can we try and stop unfair tax farming practices?

“Because look, you know, we’ve got a very low rate of corporation tax; we’re already giving business a good deal, but I think to take that deal and then say, I’m actually going to find a way of not paying any corporation tax at all that’s not right.”

Last month, MPs on the Public Accounts Committee criticised Starbucks, Google and Amazon for the “unconvincing and, in some cases, evasive” evidence they gave on why their corporation tax payments are so low.

Starbucks bowed to pressure over its accounting methods on the eve of the report’s publication saying it would review its “tax approach” in the UK.

The coffee giant told MPs it had made a loss for 14 of the 15 years it has operated in the UK, achieving just a small profit in 2006.

Starbucks, with more than 700 outlets in the UK, said it was “committed to the UK for the long term”. It said: “We are looking at our tax approach in the UK. The company has been in discussions with HMRC for some time and is also in talks with the Treasury.”

The MPs also criticised a representative from Amazon, whose responsive because he was “evasive and unprepared to answer legitimate questions”.

While the company had a UK operation involving 15,000 staff it pays little corporation tax in the UK. It said the company’s UK website reported a turnover of £207 million for 2011 but its tax expense was just £1.8 million.

via David Cameron: Tax avoiding foreign firms like Starbucks and Amazon lack ‘moral scruples’ – Telegraph.

New VAT rules to make life easier for businesses from 1st January 2013

In EU development, Tax News on 17/12/2012 at 9:17 pm

New VAT rules to make life easier for businesses from 1st January 2013

From 1st January 2013, new EU VAT rules enter into effect, which will make life much simpler for businesses across Europe.

First, electronic invoicing will have to be treated the same as paper invoicing, enabling companies to choose the VAT invoicing solution that works best for them.

This has the potential to save businesses up to €18 billion a year in reduced administration costs.

Second, Member States will be allowed to offer a cash accounting option to small businesses with a turnover less than €2 million a year.

This means that these SMEs will not have to pay the VAT until it has been received by the customer, thereby avoiding cash-flow problems for them.

Algirdas Šemeta, Commissioner for Taxation, Customs, Anti-fraud and Audit, said:

“These new VAT rules reflect what businesses in Europe need today: simpler procedures, reduced costs and support in applying solutions that best meet their needs.”

Background

The second Directive on VAT invoicing was adopted in July 2010, and must be applied in all Member States from 1st January 2013.

It aims to simplify rules on VAT invoicing to reduce burdens and barriers for businesses.

Electronic and paper invoices are placed on an equal footing, with common rules, under the Directive, in order to promote the uptake of e-invoicing. Member States will no longer be allowed to set pre-conditions for the use of electronic invoices, such as e-signatures, and invoices will be allowed to be electronically stored.

In addition, the new rules give, Member States the option of allowing small businesses with a turnover under €2 million to declare and pay their VAT when they receive or make payments , rather than at the time of the invoices.

In view of the long delay that can occur between invoicing the customer and receiving payment, in particular for small businesses, this will provide them with relief in terms of cash flow.

The transposition of VAT invoicing rules in the EU 27 Member States is also a key action under the Digital Agenda for Europe.

For a full explanation of the main VAT invoicing rule changes as from 1st January 2013, see:

via EUROPA – PRESS RELEASES – Press Release – New VAT rules to make life easier for businesses from 1st January 2013.

European Commission’s Press Release – The 2013 Annual Growth Survey: Towards fair and competitive tax systems

In EU development, Tax News on 29/11/2012 at 8:35 am

The 2013 Annual Growth Survey: Towards fair and competitive tax systems

National tax reforms in 2011 and 2012 were driven more by consolidation needs than in the preceding few years, resulting in increases in income tax and/or VAT in most Member States.

However, Member States have also faced the challenge of balancing their increased revenue needs with the need to support recovery and growth over the medium to long term.

It is here that the dual function of taxation comes into play. Taxation is more than just a revenue raising instrument.

Depending on how it is applied, it can be used to promote growth and competitiveness, boost employment and address specific social needs. Member States’ should therefore harness this potential of taxation. In their reforms they should focus on making their tax systems growth-friendly, as well as a source of quality revenues.

Tax changes in 2011 and 2012

What does the 2013 Annual Growth Survey say on taxation?

This year’s Annual Growth Survey is consistent with last year’s, in terms of the guidance given for Member States’ tax reforms.

The 5 key objectives which Member States should pursue for growth-friendly tax reforms are as valid now as they were 12 months ago. They should continue to be followed and implemented. These 5 objectives are:

  • Shift taxes away from labour towards more growth enhancing taxes such as consumption and property
  • Broaden tax bases rather than just arbitrarily raising rates, for smarter revenue raising
  • Increase environmental taxation;
  • Improve tax collection and compliance, particularly through the fight against evasion
  • Remove the tax bias which encourages debt

In addition, this year the Commission urges Member States to focus on increasing both the competitiveness and fairness of their tax systems, as these 2 principles determine the legitimacy of any tax system for the public.

Why is a “tax shift” advised?

Economic studies show that certain types of taxes – such as those on labour and income – are more distortive, while others such as consumption and environmental taxes are considered to be more growth-friendly.

These latter can also steer certain behaviours in a way that meets wider societal needs and objectives. The Commission therefore advises Member States to shift taxes away from areas that impede growth (labour, corporate taxes) towards more growth-friendly taxes (consumption, environment).

The Commission recommends in particular limiting the tax burden on labour, notably for the low-paid. Not only can this create more incentive for workers to work and employers to employ, but it also contributes to a fairer tax system by reducing the burden on the most vulnerable.

Despite the general consensus on the need to lower taxes on labour, in 2011 and 2012, the tax burden on labour has remained high.

The latest analyses shows that 1/3 of Member States1 could do more to shift taxes away from labour towards consumption, environment or property.

Moreover, the extent to which focus has been put on redistributing the burden and benefits of this taxation in an equitable way varies considerably depending on the Member State.

Therefore, the Commission reiterates the need for Member States to work on a growth-friendly and fairer tax shift in their reforms.

Why does the Commission recommend broadening tax bases, and how can this be done?

Increasing tax rates isn’t the only way of increasing tax revenues. In fact, a smarter way can often be to remove or reduce the number of tax breaks and exemptions.

For example, limiting the use of reduced VAT rates could provide Member States with important new revenue, without any need for further standard rate increases.

In fact, studies show that if all reduced rates were removed, the standard rate could actually be lowered by up to 7.5 percentage points in some cases, without any impact on overall revenues.

Tax breaks, exemptions and hidden tax subsidies not only reduce national income. They also contribute to a more complex tax system, which creates burdens for businesses and compliance difficulties for taxpayers.

Therefore broadening the tax base can also improve the overall efficiency of the tax system and ease life for companies.

A yearly independent review on all tax exemptions and reduced VAT rates is recommended by the Commission to make sure that intended economic and social objectives are achieved. Very often, this does not seem to be the case.

At EU level, a fundamental reform of the VAT system is currently underway, in order to make it simpler, more efficient and more robust (see IP/11/1508).

As part of this reform, the Commission is carrying out a review of reduced VAT rates, to see whether they are all still justifiable.

A public consultation on this issue was recently launched (see IP/12/1079), and the feedback should feed in to a Commission proposal on reduced rates next year.

The Financial Transactions Tax, which 11 Member States are currently keen to push forward through enhanced cooperation (see IP/12/1138) is another way for Member States to broaden their tax base without burdening ordinary citizens.

One of the objectives of the FTT is to ensure that the financial sector makes a more equitable contribution to public finances.

What is the benefit of increasing environmental taxation?

Green taxes (environment and energy) are considered to be amongst the most growth friendly, and also support wider policy objectives related to climate change, resource efficiency and energy security. Twenty Member States increased excise duties and other environmental taxes in 2011 and the first half of 2012.

However, this comes from a low starting point, and environmental taxes remain underdeveloped in many Member States.

Therefore, the Commission encourages Member States to take further measures to improve the existing design of taxes in this area including by adjusting the structure of tax rates on fossil fuels, indexing environmental taxes, or considering the abolition of reduced VAT rates on energy.

At EU level, the revision of the Energy Tax Directive (IP/11/468) would support Member States in a growth friendly shift towards environmental taxation, while also contributing to the EU’s climate change and energy efficiency goals and removing competitive distortions that currently exist between fuels.

Environmental tax revenues

2000-2010, % of GDP, arithmetic averages

Environmental Tax Revenue across Member States

2010, in % of GDP

Why has the Commission made fighting tax fraud and evasion a priority objective?

Hundreds of billions of euros are lost from national budgets every year due to tax evasion and fraud. Not only does this affect public income, but it also undermines the fairness of tax systems.

Honest taxpayers must pay higher taxes to compensate for evaders not paying their share.

Member States need to strengthen their administrations to combat this problem, and ensure that the controls and sanctions they have in place are strong enough deterrents.

Given the inherently cross-border nature of tax evasion, this is a problem that needs a multi-facetted approach.

Different and complementary actions need to be built up at national, EU and international level if the fight against evasion is to be effective. Close cooperation between Member States’ authorities is crucial for success, as is a strong common approach in dealing with third countries that facilitate EU evaders.

In June, Commissioner Šemeta presented concrete measures to crack down on tax fraud and evasion in the EU (see IP/12/513).

This will be reinforced in the coming weeks with the Commission’s Action Plan to tackle tax evasion and Recommendations on tax havens and aggressive tax planning.

An immediate step that Member States must take, to bring quick and important results in the fight against tax evasion, is to agree on the revision of the EU Savings Directive and the mandates to negotiate stronger agreements with Switzerland and other neighbouring countries. (see MEMO/12/353).

Why should Member States address the debt and housing bias in their tax systems?

Today’s high levels of debt means that many EU economic actors need to reduce their financial exposure.

However, the tax system of some Member States appears to encourage both households and corporate indebtedness.

The favourable tax treatment of mortgages is regarded as one of the contributing factors to over-investment in real estate and the housing price bubble that has played an important role in the crisis in several countries.

In some Member States, EU companies have tax incentives to favour the use of debt over equity. Malta, Greece, Luxembourg and France stood out as the countries with the highest gap between the tax treatment of debt and equity in 2011.

Although clearly lower, the gap was also significantly above the EU average gap, in Portugal and Italy, and above the EU average in Belgium, Spain, Germany and Sweden in 2011.

Tax induced incentives for debt financing should be reduced and debt bias in corporate and housing taxation kept under control. Similarly, aspects of tax schemes which increase the debt bias on households, typically through tax relief for mortgages, should be reviewed.

How can tax systems support competitiveness?

The competitiveness of a tax system extends far beyond merely the tax rate.

In fact, just as important are the cost and ease of compliance, the level of administrative burden, the transparency and stability of the system improving the business environment.

Moreover, a competitive tax system is one that supports the modernisation of the economy.

Dealing with the challenges of developing environmentally friendly taxation can help here, as can addressing the debt bias issue.

At EU level, the Commission is promoting a simpler, more efficient and more robust VAT system and has already initiated work to achieve this.

The proposed common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), could also considerably contribute to the competitiveness of Member States and of the EU as a whole.

By providing harmonised and simplified rules for businesses tax returns, it would lower compliance costs by nearly €1 billion, reduce the administrative burden for cross-border businesses and ensure greater legal certainty.

This, in turn, would create a more favourable environment for business and a more attractive market for investors.

What contributes to the fairness of a tax system?

A fair tax system is one in which everyone pays no more and no less than their share, everybody pays what they owe and the benefits of the tax are evenly redistributed.

Among the ways that Member States can ensure fairer tax systems are by clamping down on tax evasion and avoidance, removing hidden tax subsidies which create competitive distortions, ensuring that social effects are taken into account, and rewarding desirable activities (e.g. rewarding work and enterprise, or environmentally-friendly behaviour).

Fair taxation is an issue which also extends beyond national borders, to the extent that every Member State should be able to collect the tax revenues that it is due.

EU coordination in taxation ensures greater fairness by limiting non-taxation and abuse and preventing a “race to the bottom” approach which can curtail national reform efforts.

It also allows Member States to draw on their strength in numbers when tackling common problems such as harmful tax competition from third countries.

More information is available in taxation paper n° 34 Tax Reforms in EU Member

via EUROPA – PRESS RELEASES – Press Release – The 2013 Annual Growth Survey: Towards fair and competitive tax systems.

THOMSON REUTERS REPORT: NUMBER OF GLOBAL INDIRECT TAX CHANGES INCREASES 62 PERCENT IN Q3

In Tax News on 19/11/2012 at 3:53 pm

The quarterly ONESOURCE Indirect Tax rate report summarizes changes in sales, use and value added taxes (VAT) — providing a high-level look at information that is incorporated monthly in detail in Thomson Reuters’ ONESOURCE Indirect Tax global software suite.

Thomson Reuters’ in-house tax experts monitor changes in tax laws for over 175 countries. Highlights from the global Q3 2012 report released today include:

  • Sixty-nine state, county, city and transit sales tax increases were implemented in the U.S., compared with 97 in Q3 2011.
  • There were 20 VAT increases globally, up from 14 in Q3 2011.
  • In the U.S., the average state sales tax remained the same at 5.48 percent in Q3 2012.
  • Spain increased its standard and reduced VAT rates from 18 percent and 8 percent to 21 percent and 10 percent.
  • In China, Beijing joined the VAT Pilot program in September.
  • Two Indian states increased their standard rates. In Kamataka, rates rose from 14 percent and 5 percent to 14.5 percent and 5.5 percent. In Punjab, they rose from 12.5 percent and 5 percent to 13.5 percent and 5.5 percent.

To download full report

Read more: Thomson Reuters | Global Indirect Tax Changes Up 62 Percent in Q3.

SAP review

In Audit Defense, Business Strategy, Indirect Tax Strategic Plan, Tax News on 19/10/2012 at 12:42 pm
By Robbert Hoogeveen

(In Dutch) The most important task of SAP’s indirect tax functionality is to determine the VAT consequences of each transaction. To do this, the system must have all relevant VAT information such as the VAT qualification, VAT rate and reporting and invoicing requirements.

Relevant variables may change after the implementation of the functionality:

  1. VAT information (new master data)
  2. Other types of transactions (e.g. change in the business model)
  3. Legislation (a different VAT rate or VAT rules).

An SAP review tests the working of the VAT configuration under the influence of such changes. The SAP review can demonstrate that the VAT configuration must be improved or that additional control measures should be added to the Tax Control Framework.

The review can also bring errors and risks to light, allowing a more focused analysis to take place. After the quantification and evaluation of the risks and errors, they are assigned to the risk profile in order to be able to test against risk tolerance.

The KEY Group uses its data analysis application for this.

Depending on the client’s requirements, the following VAT-relevant subjects can be studied in SAP during an SAP review:

Depending on the client’s requirements, the following VAT-relevant subjects can be studied in SAP during an SAP review:

  • Scope
  • Risks
  • VAT treatment, correctness and the logic of the tax code structure and attributes such as VAT rate, the defined tolerance percentage when calculating VAT paid, the setting for EU-relevant VAT reporting.
  • Incorrect VAT rates and reporting (filing and/or ICL listing)
  • Conditions tables, records and decision tree logic
  • Incorrect VAT treatment/code and returns
  • The derivation from VAT registration numbers on the invoice of the partner functions used – sold_to, ship to, payer and bill_to.
  • Incorrect VAT number on the invoice, no 0% rate possible
  • VAT code descriptions for invoices
  • Incorrect sales invoices
  • iDoc tables, if applicable
  • Incorrect VAT treatment/code and returns

Click for a summary of common SAP errors.

Related Topics:

Robbert Hoogeveen is COO of the KEY Group

LinkedIn | Twitter | Facebook

Consumption tax – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

In General, Tax News on 16/10/2012 at 8:04 am

The OECD launches its Global Forum on VAT as a unique platform for a worldwide dialogue on the design and operation of VAT, notably addressing issues of double taxation and unintended non taxation.

What?

It will offer an opportunity for sharing policy analysis and experience, for identifying best practices and strengthening international co-operation among representatives from industrialised, emerging and developing countries.

Participants will explore key policy trends and their impact for tax administrations and businesses. They will discuss the design of efficient and equitable VAT systems and compare approaches. They will look at the challenges of applying VAT in an international context and consider the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines that are being developed as a set of international standards to minimise double taxation and unintended non taxation. They will share views and experiences about the challenge of administering and complying with VAT in practice.

For whom?

This first meeting of the OECD Global Forum on VAT is aimed at senior tax officials and representatives of international organisations and participation is upon invitation only. Academics and business representatives will also be invited to participate.

Where?

The First Global Forum on VAT will take place in Paris, France on 7-8 November 2012. The programme and other key documents as well as logistical information will be made available shortly on this webpage.

Contact us

For more information, please contact vat.globalforum@oecd.org.

via Consumption tax – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

 

%d bloggers like this: